0 Commentaires
68
74
20
-6
320
9:15
13
2
-2%
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M2)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.33.4
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
124.1
Score du joueur (round)
37421010
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov (total/round)
9623.7
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
24326.2
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
12826.2
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of Solid vs Bad News Chickens by the Bo3.gg Team
Solid on Anubis Analysis
Solid demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Solid on Anubis were drg, who contributed 23 kills, and ALLE, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8273 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Solid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bad News Chickens on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Bad News Chickens, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bad News Chickens on Anubis included Leomonster, who contributed 22 kills, and desh, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7673 total damage, Bad News Chickens couldn't prevent Solid from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Bad News Chickens struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires