0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
153
Éliminations par grenade HE en moyenne par carte
21.127
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:15s00:39s
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
21.43.4
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
9.42
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:09s00:39s
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
14.23.4
Morts en moyenne par carte
3.217.675
Score du joueur (round)
35301012
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of Sojoga vs DNA by the Bo3.gg Team
Sojoga on Inferno Analysis
Sojoga demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Sojoga on Inferno were land1n, who contributed 20 kills, and prt, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8814 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Sojoga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
DNA on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for DNA, as they managed to secure 4 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for DNA on Inferno included Gank88, who contributed 11 kills, and Project90, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5063 total damage, DNA couldn't prevent Sojoga from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, DNA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires