0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
100%
Ancient
40%
Mirage
33%
Nuke
25%
Overpass
10%
Inferno
7%
Anubis
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Ancient
40%
5
0
Mirage
0%
0
1
Nuke
75%
4
0
Overpass
33%
6
0
Inferno
67%
3
0
Anubis
0%
0
1
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Ancient
0%
1
1
Mirage
33%
3
0
Nuke
50%
2
1
Overpass
43%
7
0
Inferno
60%
5
1
Anubis
0%
2
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- mnpgmng
- pmngpmn
Informations
Match analysis of SSP vs SNOGARD Dragons by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SSP and SNOGARD Dragons, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by SNOGARD Dragons. The MVP of this match was ND.
SNOGARD Dragons analytics
The team SNOGARD Dragons secured 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SNOGARD Dragons were ND contributed 58 kills and MoJo contributed 52 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22789 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SNOGARD Dragons held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SSP analytics
The team SSP managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SSP were farmaG contributed 46 kills and anNbelievable contributed 29 kills. 15965 of total damage by SSP could not prevent SNOGARD Dragons from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SSP struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires