0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.82.1
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
56%15%
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2014.5022
Éliminations en ouverture en moyenne par carte
7.922.8324
Score du joueur (round)
38141010
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
10426.2
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
11426.2
Informations
Map Analysis of SINNERS vs Gaimin Gladiators by the Bo3.gg Team
Gaimin Gladiators on Inferno Analysis
Gaimin Gladiators demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Gaimin Gladiators on Inferno were kraghen, who contributed 26 kills, and nicoodoz, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8102 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Gaimin Gladiators held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
SINNERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for SINNERS, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for SINNERS on Inferno included oskar, who contributed 20 kills, and Majky, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7398 total damage, SINNERS couldn't prevent Gaimin Gladiators from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires