0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M0)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
68%
Dust II
43%
Inferno
18%
Ancient
14%
Nuke
12%
Mirage
3%
Anubis
1%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
68%
28
2
Dust II
0%
1
56
Inferno
47%
17
25
Ancient
66%
32
11
Nuke
43%
35
25
Mirage
66%
35
10
Anubis
53%
30
5
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
1
24
Dust II
43%
14
11
Inferno
65%
26
7
Ancient
52%
21
12
Nuke
55%
29
2
Mirage
63%
30
0
Anubis
52%
27
8
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
- ggggp
- gpgpg
Informations
Map Analysis of Sharks vs Bounty Hunters by the Bo3.gg Team
Sharks on Ancient Analysis
Sharks demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Sharks on Ancient were rdnzao, who contributed 16 kills, and hoax, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7102 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bounty Hunters on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Bounty Hunters, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bounty Hunters on Ancient included Bruninho, who contributed 13 kills, and meyern, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5584 total damage, Bounty Hunters couldn't prevent Sharks from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Bounty Hunters struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires