0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.5986
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
31.3011
Échanges en moyenne par carte
10.083.3972
Assistances en moyenne par carte
124.4746
Round rapide (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Score du joueur (round)
35531010
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
100%
Nuke
100%
Ancient
80%
Dust II
23%
Anubis
17%
Inferno
8%
Mirage
4%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dust II
63%
8
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Inferno
25%
4
0
Mirage
71%
7
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
8
Ancient
80%
15
0
Dust II
40%
5
5
Anubis
50%
14
2
Inferno
17%
6
3
Mirage
75%
8
3
Informations
Match analysis of SGGT vs GR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SGGT and GR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by GR. The MVP of this match was mediocrity.
GR analytics
The team GR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GR were mediocrity contributed 22 kills and SALO_MUX contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8967 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SGGT analytics
The team SGGT managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SGGT were Sange contributed 19 kills and lame contributed 19 kills. 9532 of total damage by SGGT could not prevent GR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SGGT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires