0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
18.45.6
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5330
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.93.4
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2515.0371
Dégâts avec M4A4 en moyenne (par tour)
38.212.7
Dégâts (total/round)
40973
Score du joueur (round)
36231012
Score du joueur (round)
41661012
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of SAW vs Wisla Krakow by the Bo3.gg Team
SAW on Inferno Analysis
SAW demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for SAW on Inferno were stadodo, who contributed 17 kills, and JUST, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8430 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Wisla Krakow on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Wisla Krakow, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Wisla Krakow on Inferno included SZPERO, who contributed 14 kills, and jedqr, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6701 total damage, Wisla Krakow couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Wisla Krakow struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires