0 Commentaires
103
74
16
+29
415
15:11
29
1
+14%
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M2)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
51.616
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
184.6
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2415.0371
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
206.732
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
68.725.3
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Clutch (adversaires)
3
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
9926.8
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of SAW vs Lyngby Vikings by the Bo3.gg Team
Lyngby Vikings on Nuke Analysis
Lyngby Vikings demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Nuke were FASHR, who contributed 28 kills, and maNkz, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10797 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
SAW on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for SAW, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for SAW on Nuke included story, who contributed 16 kills, and rmn, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8354 total damage, SAW couldn't prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires