0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M1)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
23.45.6
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
164.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
53.416.7
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
82
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
41.3055
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:46s00:39s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2615.0371
Score du joueur (round)
35071012
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Tirs (total/round)
9016
Informations
Map Analysis of SAW vs ex-Finest by the Bo3.gg Team
SAW on Nuke Analysis
SAW demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 17 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for SAW on Nuke were story, who contributed 32 kills, and rmn, who added 31 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 12311 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ex-Finest on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for ex-Finest, as they managed to secure 11 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ex-Finest on Nuke included Snax, who contributed 21 kills, and twist, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10177 total damage, ex-Finest couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, ex-Finest struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires