0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M1)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:28s01:30s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2515.0371
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
02:12s00:39s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3515.0371
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.13.8
Tirs (total/round)
10316
Score du joueur (round)
35831012
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of SAW vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team
SAW on Nuke Analysis
SAW demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for SAW on Nuke were ewjerkz, who contributed 23 kills, and arrozdoce, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9845 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Eternal Fire on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Eternal Fire, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Nuke included XANTARES, who contributed 22 kills, and MAJ3R, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8385 total damage, Eternal Fire couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Eternal Fire struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires