0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
5.9
6
Mirage0.1
Manches gagnées
11
13
Mirage2
Éliminations
84
63
Mirage-21
Dégâts
8.77K
6.78K
Mirage-1984
Économie
492.9K
386.65K
Mirage-106250
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
63%
Mirage
P
60%
Inferno
P
45%
Ancient
35%
Overpass
29%
Nuke
24%
Anubis
20%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
63%
16
3
Mirage
40%
15
10
Inferno
55%
11
7
Ancient
35%
17
5
Overpass
29%
7
9
Nuke
24%
17
1
Anubis
20%
5
19
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
2
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
3
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Informations
Match analysis of Sashi vs POLET by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sashi and POLET, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by POLET. The MVP of this match was n1xen.
POLET analytics
The team POLET secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for POLET were ANASTAZE contributed 23 kills and Proper contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6784 overall damage.
On the defensive side, POLET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sashi analytics
The team Sashi managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sashi were n1xen contributed 23 kills and aizy contributed 18 kills. 8768 of total damage by Sashi could not prevent POLET from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sashi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires