Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
206.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
71.921.6
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
14.13.4
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
123.6448
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
12.13.8
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
13.23.4
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
103.6448
Dégâts avec M4A4 en moyenne (par tour)
41.112.7
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6430
Éliminations en moyenne par carte
34.0817.5558
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of Sangal vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sangal and AGO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was snatchie.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 32 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were snatchie contributed 55 kills and rallen contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21299 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal managed to secure 19 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sangal were paz contributed 41 kills and MAJ3R contributed 30 kills. 15936 of total damage by Sangal could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires