0 Commentaires
63
79
18
-16
349
12:9
15
0
-9%
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8161
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
185.7
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
8.22
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8161
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
22.95.7
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
93.5373
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:21s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of Sampi vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
Sampi on Anubis Analysis
Sampi demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Sampi on Anubis were sAvana1, who contributed 21 kills, and The eLiVe, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8057 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Sampi held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included simke, who contributed 18 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7326 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent Sampi from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires