0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M0)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:26s
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8171
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
21.35.8
Éliminations en ouverture en moyenne par carte
72.8624
Assistances en moyenne par carte
104.4098
Multikills x-
4
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov (total/round)
8823.8
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:19s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of RUSH B vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
EYEBALLERS demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno were JW, who contributed 19 kills, and HEAP, who added 11 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6935 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
RUSH B on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for RUSH B, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for RUSH B on Inferno included nota, who contributed 16 kills, and kinqie, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5509 total damage, RUSH B couldn't prevent EYEBALLERS from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, RUSH B struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires