0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
146.6606
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
63.925.3
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
146.6606
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
60.525.3
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
94.5517
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
50.216.3
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
16.33.9
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
12.63.5
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.6107
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
24.44.7
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of AMKAL vs RUBY by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AMKAL and RUBY, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, and victory was secured by AMKAL. The MVP of this match was Forester.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL secured 26 out of 37 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AMKAL were Forester contributed 41 kills and Krad contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16260 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
RUBY analytics
The team RUBY managed to secure 11 out of 37 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for RUBY were sowalio contributed 25 kills and dekz contributed 25 kills. 12848 of total damage by RUBY could not prevent AMKAL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, RUBY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires