0 Commentaires
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:27s
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
71.8161
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
30.45.7
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2114.8354
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2414.8354
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
59.125.3
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4429
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
12.53.9
Score du joueur (round)
34871011
Score du joueur (round)
35821011
Informations
Map Analysis of Rooster vs Mindfreak by the Bo3.gg Team
Rooster on Anubis Analysis
Rooster demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Rooster on Anubis were Rackem, who contributed 17 kills, and TjP, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8354 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Mindfreak on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Mindfreak, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Mindfreak on Anubis included dangeR, who contributed 20 kills, and dpr, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7671 total damage, Mindfreak couldn't prevent Rooster from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Mindfreak struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires