0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Vertigo (M2)
Records Vertigo
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:25s01:30s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
10830
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
166.732
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
78.525.3
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.43.8
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.732
Tirs (total/round)
9416
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of Rooster vs God's Work by the Bo3.gg Team
Rooster on Vertigo Analysis
Rooster demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Rooster on Vertigo were TjP, who contributed 26 kills, and nettik, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 9082 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
God's Work on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for God's Work, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for God's Work on Vertigo included Fabzy, who contributed 9 kills, and Oath, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5691 total damage, God's Work couldn't prevent Rooster from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, God's Work struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires