Rooster Tableau des résultats Inferno (M1)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

20

18

2

+2

82

3:3

5

0

6.7

+12%

20

21

1

-1

89

0:4

1

0

6.2

-4%

16

20

5

-4

91

0:2

5

0

6.1

-3%

10

21

6

-11

57

2:5

3

0

4.8

-28%

5

19

3

-14

37

1:4

0

0

3.6

-51%

Total

71

99

17

-28

355

6:18

14

0

5.5

-15%

DGG Tableau des résultats Inferno (M1)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

MVP

32

13

6

+19

139

8:3

6

1

10.0

+58%

23

12

4

+11

85

4:0

7

0

7.6

+24%

19

19

5

0

93

4:1

6

0

7.0

+10%

14

13

10

+1

69

1:2

3

2

6.1

+5%

9

15

5

-6

55

0:-1

1

0

4.8

-18%

Total

97

72

30

+25

441

17:5

23

3

7.1

+16%

avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Informations
Map Analysis of Rooster vs DGG by the Bo3.gg Team

DGG on Inferno Analysis

DGG demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for DGG on Inferno were zeph, who contributed 32 kills, and gump, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10145 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, DGG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Rooster on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Rooster, as they managed to secure 8 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Rooster on Inferno included TjP, who contributed 20 kills, and val, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8162 total damage, Rooster couldn't prevent DGG from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date