0 Commentaires
92
55
19
+37
438
10:12
22
1
+26%
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M3)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
58.725.3
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
93.6448
Dégâts avec M4A4 en moyenne (par tour)
36.912.7
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.616
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
15.64.6
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.82
Dégâts en moyenne (par tour)
134.91939.7
Tirs (total/round)
9316
Tirs (total/round)
9116
Tirs (total/round)
8416
Informations
Map Analysis of RBG vs Bad News Bears by the Bo3.gg Team
Bad News Bears on Nuke Analysis
Bad News Bears demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 15 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Bad News Bears on Nuke were Spongey, who contributed 27 kills, and Junior, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9636 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Bad News Bears held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
RBG on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for RBG, as they managed to secure 7 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for RBG on Nuke included HexT, who contributed 13 kills, and CLASIA, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6574 total damage, RBG couldn't prevent Bad News Bears from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, RBG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires