fnatic Tableau des résultats Anubis (M1)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

21

14

4

+7

108

5:3

5

0

7.6

+22%

18

18

6

0

87

2:5

5

1

6.3

+10%

15

12

8

+3

73

0:0

4

0

6.0

-7%

13

13

2

0

54

2:4

4

0

5.3

-8%

10

13

5

-3

43

1:2

3

0

5.0

-20%

Total

77

70

25

+7

365

10:14

21

1

6.1

-1%

QUAZAR Tableau des résultats Anubis (M1)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

16

14

4

+2

72

6:2

5

1

6.6

+9%

16

16

3

0

69

4:2

4

1

6.5

-9%

15

15

7

0

74

3:3

4

0

6.1

+15%

12

12

0

0

49

0:2

2

1

5.2

-1%

11

20

6

-9

61

1:1

2

0

4.9

-11%

Total

70

77

20

-7

326

14:10

17

3

5.9

+1%

avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Informations
Map Analysis of fnatic vs QUAZAR by the Bo3.gg Team

QUAZAR on Anubis Analysis

QUAZAR demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for QUAZAR on Anubis were Muk0s, who contributed 16 kills, and Tommy, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7818 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, QUAZAR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


fnatic on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for fnatic, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for fnatic on Anubis included MATYS, who contributed 21 kills, and bodyy, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8752 total damage, fnatic couldn't prevent QUAZAR from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date