0 Commentaires
-176
177
0
-353
0
-27:-27
0
6
-99%
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Nuke
Q
100%
Mirage
Q
100%
Ancient
Q
100%
Inferno
Q
67%
Anubis
Q
20%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Nuke
0%
0
2
Mirage
0%
0
3
Ancient
0%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
3
Anubis
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
2
2
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Nuke
100%
1
2
Mirage
100%
2
3
Ancient
100%
6
2
Inferno
67%
3
0
Anubis
80%
5
0
Overpass
0%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
0
6
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pp
- ggggg
Informations
Match analysis of QM vs Question Mark by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between QM and Question Mark, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by QM. The MVP of this match was nifee3.
QM analytics
The team QM secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for QM were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, QM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Question Mark analytics
The team Question Mark managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Question Mark were nifee3 contributed -5 kills and syrsoN contributed -13 kills. 0 of total damage by Question Mark could not prevent QM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Question Mark struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires