Project G Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

60

52

22

+8

99

13:8

15

2

Inferno7.3

7.2

+12%

47

53

12

-6

78

6:10

10

0

Inferno6.1

5.8

-3%

48

49

9

-1

62

2:4

12

0

Inferno6.5

5.7

-9%

48

51

9

-3

68

6:13

13

1

Inferno5.7

5.7

-5%

36

55

16

-19

66

3:6

6

0

Inferno5.3

5.3

-15%

Total

239

260

68

-21

372

30:41

56

3

Inferno6.2

5.9

-4%

Verdant Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

67

49

15

+18

99

7:6

16

2

Inferno6.8

7.3

+33%

62

41

5

+21

84

11:0

18

0

Inferno7.1

7.2

+16%

52

46

11

+6

86

9:4

11

2

Inferno6

6.6

+9%

43

54

19

-11

73

9:12

10

2

Inferno6

6.0

-1%

34

50

14

-16

56

5:8

8

1

Inferno5.5

5.3

-17%

Total

258

240

64

+18

397

41:30

63

7

Inferno6.3

6.5

+8%

SkinClub Worldwide
score predict & Analytics Insights
2 - 0
2 - 1
Résultat
1 - 2
0 - 2
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

5.8

6.6

Inferno0.1

Manches gagnées

16

19

Inferno3

Éliminations

119

123

Inferno4

Dégâts

13.37K

13.28K

Inferno-91

Économie

1.47M

1.5M

Inferno-8750

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

31.6558

Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

106.5019

Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

136.5019

Échanges en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

7.523.428

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:31s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:35s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:32s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:30s01:55s

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Ancient

48261010

Multikills x-

  •  Ancient

4

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions

Il n'y a actuellement aucune information liée à ce choix de cartes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Vertigo

43%

Dust II

40%

Mirage

34%

Ancient

27%

Nuke

16%

Inferno

15%

Anubis

12%

Dernières 5 cartes

Vertigo

100%

1

2

fb

Dust II

100%

1

4

fb
fb
fb
fb
g

Mirage

67%

9

0

p
g
g
p
g

Ancient

29%

7

2

g
p
p
g
p

Nuke

40%

10

1

p
p
p
p
p

Inferno

50%

6

1

g
g
p
g
p

Anubis

36%

14

0

p
p
g
g
p

Dernières 5 cartes

Vertigo

57%

42

0

g
p
p
p

Dust II

60%

5

14

fb
fb
p
g
g

Mirage

33%

15

21

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Ancient

56%

43

3

g
g
p
p
p

Nuke

56%

54

0

g
p
g
p
g

Inferno

35%

17

6

g
p
g
p
p

Anubis

48%

42

6

p
g
p
p
g
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Les équipes ne se sont pas rencontrées au cours des 6 derniers mois
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of Project G vs Verdant by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between Project G and Verdant, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Vertigo, Inferno, and victory was secured by Verdant. The MVP of this match was Vacancy.


Verdant analytics

The team Verdant secured 41 out of 73 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.


The standout players for Verdant were Vacancy contributed 67 kills and Diviiii contributed 62 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27607 overall damage.


On the defensive side, Verdant held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Project G analytics

The team Project G managed to secure 32 out of 73 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Project G were ritchiEE contributed 60 kills and Vegi contributed 47 kills. 26672 of total damage by Project G could not prevent Verdant from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Project G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date