Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:31s01:28s
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
163.8
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:33s00:39s
Leurres lancés en moyenne
31.2859
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2215.0791
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
16.85.6
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4398
Éliminations en ouverture en moyenne par carte
8.052.9143
Clutch (adversaires)
3
Informations
Map Analysis of Pompa vs Project G by the Bo3.gg Team
Project G on Anubis Analysis
Project G demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Project G on Anubis were Lekr0, who contributed 18 kills, and Dragon, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8329 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Project G held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Pompa on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Pompa, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Pompa on Anubis included h4rn, who contributed 19 kills, and bnox, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7495 total damage, Pompa couldn't prevent Project G from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Pompa struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires