0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Nuke
55%
Inferno
51%
Anubis
32%
Dust II
15%
Mirage
7%
Ancient
6%
Vertigo
1%
Dernières 5 cartes
Nuke
0%
0
77
Inferno
51%
35
16
Anubis
67%
60
10
Dust II
48%
29
25
Mirage
55%
64
7
Ancient
63%
65
13
Vertigo
68%
44
8
Dernières 5 cartes
Nuke
55%
20
1
Inferno
0%
1
19
Anubis
35%
23
3
Dust II
33%
6
8
Mirage
62%
13
1
Ancient
69%
39
0
Vertigo
67%
3
12
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ppggg
- gpgpp
Informations
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs HOTU by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Anubis Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Anubis were fear, who contributed 19 kills, and s-chilla, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6742 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
HOTU on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for HOTU, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for HOTU on Anubis included lampada, who contributed 9 kills, and anttzz, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4743 total damage, HOTU couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires