0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:28s01:24s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:26s01:24s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:31s01:24s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2214.3232
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
14.44.8
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
13.24.2
Assistances en moyenne par carte
12.14.4746
Score du joueur (round)
34991010
Dégâts (total/round)
50073
Score du joueur (round)
46411010
Informations
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs Apogee by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Anubis Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Anubis were Jambo, who contributed 21 kills, and s-chilla, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8807 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Apogee on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Apogee, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Apogee on Anubis included Prism, who contributed 15 kills, and POLO, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7935 total damage, Apogee couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Apogee struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires