0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
50%
Overpass
23%
Mirage
19%
Inferno
0%
Ancient
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
50%
4
0
Vertigo
50%
2
2
Nuke
50%
2
2
Overpass
56%
9
0
Mirage
14%
7
0
Inferno
50%
6
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
3
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Overpass
33%
6
0
Mirage
33%
3
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gpppp
- ppppp
Informations
Match analysis of Party Daddlers vs Arrow by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Party Daddlers and Arrow, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by Party Daddlers. The MVP of this match was UN1TY.
Party Daddlers analytics
The team Party Daddlers secured 26 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Party Daddlers were syncD contributed 21 kills and DeniMM contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10524 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Party Daddlers held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Arrow analytics
The team Arrow managed to secure 0 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Arrow were UN1TY contributed 31 kills and sehza contributed 17 kills. 10290 of total damage by Arrow could not prevent Party Daddlers from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Arrow struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires