0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:23s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1914.2369
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8162
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
16.96
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
31.5972
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.23.4
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
126.3792
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
62.425.2
Assistances en moyenne par carte
10.074.4987
Score du joueur (round)
35961010
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
- —
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- —
- —
Composition de l'équipe







Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Train
63%
Mirage
20%
Anubis
18%
Inferno
15%
Ancient
12%
Dust II
6%
Nuke
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Train
63%
8
8
Mirage
41%
22
8
Anubis
53%
17
9
Inferno
78%
9
19
Ancient
58%
33
7
Dust II
73%
30
1
Nuke
50%
4
38
Dernières 5 cartes
Train
0%
0
24
Mirage
61%
38
13
Anubis
71%
34
11
Inferno
63%
24
27
Ancient
70%
69
4
Dust II
67%
30
9
Nuke
50%
36
20
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggggp
- pggpg
Informations
Match analysis of PARIVISION vs NAVI Junior by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PARIVISION and NAVI Junior, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, Dust II, and victory was secured by NAVI Junior. The MVP of this match was dziugss.
NAVI Junior analytics
The team NAVI Junior secured 39 out of 64 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NAVI Junior were dziugss contributed 54 kills and makazze contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24147 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NAVI Junior held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PARIVISION analytics
The team PARIVISION managed to secure 25 out of 64 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PARIVISION were nota contributed 52 kills and Jame contributed 37 kills. 23173 of total damage by PARIVISION could not prevent NAVI Junior from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PARIVISION struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires