Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:33s01:23s
Éliminations par grenade HE en moyenne par carte
21.1175
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
16.35.3
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5628
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2014.2369
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
62.125.2
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.12
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8162
Score du joueur (round)
36121010
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Informations
Map Analysis of paiN vs Astralis by the Bo3.gg Team
Astralis on Inferno Analysis
Astralis demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Astralis on Inferno were cadiaN, who contributed 18 kills, and dev1ce, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7221 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Astralis held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
paiN on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for paiN, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for paiN on Inferno included nqz, who contributed 13 kills, and biguzera, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6155 total damage, paiN couldn't prevent Astralis from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires