0 Commentaires
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.93.8
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
91.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
37.45.6
Éliminations avec cocktails Molotov en moyenne par carte
21.0849
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:31s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6630
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
15.14.6
Score du joueur (round)
35001012
Dégâts (total/round)
42473
Score du joueur (round)
36051012
Informations
Map Analysis of paiN vs GODSENT by the Bo3.gg Team
GODSENT on Dust II Analysis
GODSENT demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for GODSENT on Dust II were felps, who contributed 23 kills, and latto, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9072 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, GODSENT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
paiN on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for paiN, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for paiN on Dust II included NEKIZ, who contributed 15 kills, and PKL, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6304 total damage, paiN couldn't prevent GODSENT from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, paiN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires