0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
6.5
5.7
Overpass1.1
Manches gagnées
38
31
Overpass5
Éliminations
254
220
Overpass24
Dégâts
27.34K
25.09K
Overpass1778
Économie
1.54M
1.53M
Overpass41300
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
64%
Nuke
59%
Inferno
47%
Overpass
40%
Dust II
33%
Mirage
0%
Ancient
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
64%
11
1
Nuke
59%
17
0
Inferno
47%
15
1
Overpass
40%
10
5
Dust II
33%
6
3
Mirage
0%
0
15
Ancient
0%
3
8
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Informations
Match analysis of PACT vs DOGS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PACT and DOGS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Nuke, and victory was secured by PACT. The MVP of this match was darko.
PACT analytics
The team PACT secured 38 out of 69 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Nuke. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PACT were darko contributed 56 kills and Bielany contributed 63 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27339 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PACT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DOGS analytics
The team DOGS managed to secure 31 out of 69 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DOGS were M1key contributed 51 kills and L00m1 contributed 44 kills. 25093 of total damage by DOGS could not prevent PACT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DOGS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires