0 Commentaires
236
211
62
+25
402
32:30
55
6
Mirage5.8
0%
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
- Titulaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
100%
Anubis
100%
Mirage
75%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
25%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
100%
1
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Mirage
25%
4
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
25%
4
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
0
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
3
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgppp
- ppg
Informations
Match analysis of Octagonal Disposition vs -72c by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Octagonal Disposition and -72c, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Octagonal Disposition. The MVP of this match was elernity.
Octagonal Disposition analytics
The team Octagonal Disposition secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Octagonal Disposition were elernity contributed 53 kills and rAge contributed 57 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24896 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Octagonal Disposition held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
-72c analytics
The team -72c managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for -72c were borosto contributed 53 kills and blaze- contributed 42 kills. 23065 of total damage by -72c could not prevent Octagonal Disposition from securing the victory
On the defensive side, -72c struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires