0 Commentaires
138
108
53
+30
523
13:17
36
3
0%
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
w
100%
Nuke
N
50%
Ancient
N
50%
Anubis
N
6%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
1
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
50%
6
0
Anubis
56%
9
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gggpg
- ggg
Informations
Map Analysis of NuTorious vs who cares by the Bo3.gg Team
NuTorious on Anubis Analysis
NuTorious demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for NuTorious on Anubis were Msaia-btw, who contributed 39 kills, and jr24racing, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 15699 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, NuTorious held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
who cares on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for who cares, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for who cares on Anubis included baiser, who contributed 45 kills, and Foxl, who added 36 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 16450 total damage, who cares couldn't prevent NuTorious from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, who cares struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires