0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
N
100%
Nuke
62%
Dust II
53%
Ancient
N
52%
Mirage
48%
Anubis
44%
Vertigo
22%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
100%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
0
34
Nuke
62%
39
1
Dust II
53%
15
4
Ancient
48%
31
3
Mirage
48%
25
7
Anubis
44%
34
7
Vertigo
22%
18
12
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgggg
- pppgg
Informations
Map Analysis of Nuclear TigeRES vs RUBY by the Bo3.gg Team
Nuclear TigeRES on Ancient Analysis
Nuclear TigeRES demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Nuclear TigeRES on Ancient were fluffy, who contributed 21 kills, and H4SAN4TOR, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7232 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Nuclear TigeRES held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
RUBY on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for RUBY, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for RUBY on Ancient included Kaide, who contributed 13 kills, and dekz, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5652 total damage, RUBY couldn't prevent Nuclear TigeRES from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, RUBY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires