0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
82%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
45%
Inferno
40%
Vertigo
36%
Anubis
33%
Overpass
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
2
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
82%
11
2
Nuke
50%
12
1
Mirage
55%
11
0
Inferno
40%
10
7
Vertigo
14%
7
6
Anubis
33%
12
3
Overpass
0%
1
12
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggpgg
- gpppp
Informations
Match analysis of NOM vs Lazer Cats by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between NOM and Lazer Cats, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, Vertigo, and victory was secured by NOM. The MVP of this match was ultimate.
NOM analytics
The team NOM secured 32 out of 52 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Vertigo. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NOM were ultimate contributed 47 kills and AMSALEM contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18223 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NOM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lazer Cats analytics
The team Lazer Cats managed to secure 20 out of 52 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lazer Cats were 7oX1C contributed 42 kills and Templ contributed 36 kills. 16966 of total damage by Lazer Cats could not prevent NOM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lazer Cats struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires