0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
13.13.4
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
64.925.3
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.34.6
Tirs (total/round)
8416
Tirs (total/round)
9716
Score du joueur (round)
41821012
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
9526.8
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
15226.8
Informations
Map Analysis of Ninjas in Pyjamas vs Virtus.pro by the Bo3.gg Team
Virtus.pro on Inferno Analysis
Virtus.pro demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Virtus.pro on Inferno were buster, who contributed 21 kills, and Qikert, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9957 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Virtus.pro held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Ninjas in Pyjamas on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Ninjas in Pyjamas, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Ninjas in Pyjamas on Inferno included hampus, who contributed 23 kills, and REZ, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9501 total damage, Ninjas in Pyjamas couldn't prevent Virtus.pro from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Ninjas in Pyjamas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires