0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M3)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
103
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
17.93.8
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2015.0371
Score du joueur (round)
39531012
Multikills x-
4
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of Ninjas in Pyjamas vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
Ninjas in Pyjamas on Inferno Analysis
Ninjas in Pyjamas demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Ninjas in Pyjamas on Inferno were hampus, who contributed 22 kills, and dev1ce, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8623 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Ninjas in Pyjamas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
BIG on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 5 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for BIG on Inferno included syrsoN, who contributed 16 kills, and k1to, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5906 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent Ninjas in Pyjamas from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires