Nexus Tableau des résultats Inferno (M2)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

13

17

2

-4

85

3:4

2

0

5.8

-4%

4

16

3

-12

42

0:1

1

1

4.6

-38%

9

17

1

-8

53

1:2

1

0

4.5

-30%

7

19

1

-12

59

1:2

0

0

4.4

-37%

8

18

1

-10

37

3:2

1

0

4.2

-45%

Total

41

87

8

-46

276

8:11

5

1

4.7

-31%

Sangal Tableau des résultats Inferno (M2)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

19

5

6

+14

113

2:0

5

0

8.5

+55%

20

11

3

+9

109

4:1

7

0

8.3

+44%

19

7

2

+12

90

2:2

5

0

7.7

+47%

15

8

5

+7

84

2:2

4

0

7.3

+18%

14

10

5

+4

81

1:3

4

0

6.4

+23%

Total

87

41

21

+46

477

11:8

25

0

7.7

+37%

avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Informations
Map Analysis of Nexus vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team

Sangal on Inferno Analysis

Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Sangal on Inferno were PANIX, who contributed 19 kills, and LNZ, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9066 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Nexus on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Nexus, as they managed to secure 3 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Nexus on Inferno included smekk, who contributed 13 kills, and BTN, who added 4 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5252 total damage, Nexus couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date