0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
14.43.8
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
18.25.4
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
13.42
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1815.0371
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.53.4
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
134.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
51.316.7
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.52
Assistances en moyenne par carte
104.3517
Dégâts (total/round)
40573
Informations
Map Analysis of Nexus vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
ECLOT on Inferno Analysis
ECLOT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ECLOT on Inferno were Dytor, who contributed 26 kills, and nbqq, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9129 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Nexus on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Nexus, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Nexus on Inferno included BTN, who contributed 9 kills, and SEMINTE, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5656 total damage, Nexus couldn't prevent ECLOT from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Nexus struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires