0 Commentaires
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:24s01:25s
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8164
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
22.85.9
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2114.5022
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
22.43.4
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8164
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
19.15.9
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2014.5022
Assistances en moyenne par carte
10.924.4315
Assistances en moyenne par carte
11.974.4315
Informations
Map Analysis of Nemiga vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
Nemiga on Anubis Analysis
Nemiga demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Nemiga on Anubis were riskyb0b, who contributed 18 kills, and 1eeR, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8719 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GUN5 on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for GUN5, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GUN5 on Anubis included xiELO, who contributed 19 kills, and tN1R, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7944 total damage, GUN5 couldn't prevent Nemiga from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires