0 Commentaires
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
00:58s00:35s
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.84.2
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
41.6362
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
21.3022
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
11.83.7
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
31.5972
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
10926.1
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of Nemiga vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
Nemiga on Dust II Analysis
Nemiga demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Nemiga on Dust II were 1eeR, who contributed 18 kills, and riskyb0b, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7622 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Nemiga held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
500 on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for 500, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for 500 on Dust II included SPELLAN, who contributed 15 kills, and CeRq, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5743 total damage, 500 couldn't prevent Nemiga from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, 500 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires