0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Nuke
34%
Vertigo
33%
Dust II
10%
Mirage
5%
Ancient
3%
Overpass
2%
Inferno
1%
Dernières 5 cartes
Nuke
54%
13
6
Vertigo
50%
14
0
Dust II
0%
0
35
Mirage
55%
11
12
Ancient
50%
12
4
Overpass
38%
13
9
Inferno
43%
14
10
Dernières 5 cartes
Nuke
20%
10
2
Vertigo
17%
6
2
Dust II
10%
10
2
Mirage
50%
8
2
Ancient
47%
15
3
Overpass
40%
10
0
Inferno
42%
12
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ppppp
- pgppp
Informations
Match analysis of Movistar Riders vs VELOX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Movistar Riders and VELOX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Ancient, and victory was secured by Movistar Riders. The MVP of this match was Martinez.
Movistar Riders analytics
The team Movistar Riders secured 22 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Ancient. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Movistar Riders were Martinez contributed 51 kills and mopoz contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18122 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Movistar Riders held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
VELOX analytics
The team VELOX managed to secure 20 out of 42 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for VELOX were NaOw contributed 29 kills and Shr contributed 13 kills. 11557 of total damage by VELOX could not prevent Movistar Riders from securing the victory
On the defensive side, VELOX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires