MOUZ Tableau des résultats Inferno (M2)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

18

12

3

+6

88

2:0

5

0

6.8

+17%

12

15

2

-3

54

4:4

4

1

5.7

-17%

11

16

5

-5

91

3:4

3

0

5.5

0%

8

13

5

-5

51

0:0

2

0

4.9

-28%

10

16

4

-6

55

2:2

1

0

4.7

-17%

Total

59

72

19

-13

339

11:10

15

1

5.5

-9%

Preasy Tableau des résultats Inferno (M2)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

19

11

4

+8

84

3:3

6

0

6.7

+24%

15

10

2

+5

72

1:1

3

1

6.7

+9%

16

15

4

+1

76

2:2

4

0

5.8

+8%

11

10

9

+1

81

3:3

2

0

5.6

+3%

11

13

3

-2

67

1:2

2

0

5.5

-13%

Total

72

59

22

+13

381

10:11

17

1

6.1

+6%

avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Informations
Map Analysis of MOUZ vs Preasy by the Bo3.gg Team

Preasy on Inferno Analysis

Preasy demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Preasy on Inferno were roeJ, who contributed 19 kills, and refrezh, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8002 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Preasy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MOUZ on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MOUZ, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MOUZ on Inferno included Jimpphat, who contributed 18 kills, and xertioN, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7117 total damage, MOUZ couldn't prevent Preasy from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MOUZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date