Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
14.64.2
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
17.74.9
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5728
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.93.4
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
51.816.3
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
31.5972
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
15.94.9
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
31.8162
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
19.46
Assistances en moyenne par carte
8.964.4987
Informations
Map Analysis of Monte vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team
AMKAL on Dust II Analysis
AMKAL demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for AMKAL on Dust II were molodoy, who contributed 18 kills, and kAlash, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7179 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Monte on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Monte, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Monte on Dust II included hades, who contributed 11 kills, and dycha, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5074 total damage, Monte couldn't prevent AMKAL from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Monte struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires