85
95
26
-10
696
10:10
19
1
Ancient5.8
-4%
85
96
30
-11
593
10:10
22
0
Ancient3.5
-8%
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:31s01:30s
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
36.732
Éliminations par grenade HE en moyenne par carte
11.127
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
13.23.4
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
11.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
18.43.8
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
11.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
203.8
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
00:25s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
1330
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
67%
Vertigo
37%
Mirage
33%
Nuke
29%
Inferno
25%
Overpass
25%
Dust II
8%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
33%
9
3
Vertigo
38%
8
6
Mirage
38%
16
4
Nuke
29%
7
19
Inferno
25%
8
13
Overpass
50%
6
5
Dust II
25%
4
10
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
100%
1
8
Vertigo
75%
4
0
Mirage
71%
7
0
Nuke
0%
0
9
Inferno
50%
6
0
Overpass
25%
4
1
Dust II
33%
3
4
Informations
Match analysis of MIBR vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was Tuurtle.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 17 out of 31 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were nbqq contributed 1 kills and nbqq contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10179 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 13 out of 31 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were Tuurtle contributed 4 kills and Tuurtle contributed 17 kills. 10476 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires