0 Commentaires
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
51.616
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
14.74.6
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
134.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
44.916.7
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2515.0371
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
174.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
65.116.7
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
7630
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Score du joueur (round)
38601012
Informations
Map Analysis of MIBR vs Cruzeiro by the Bo3.gg Team
MIBR on Dust II Analysis
MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for MIBR on Dust II were chelo, who contributed 23 kills, and Tuurtle, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10879 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Cruzeiro on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Cruzeiro, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Cruzeiro on Dust II included lux, who contributed 30 kills, and TEKO, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9263 total damage, Cruzeiro couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Cruzeiro struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires