0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
47.216.7
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
246.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
62.321.6
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
02:18s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
13730
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3415.0371
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
13.63.4
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Informations
Map Analysis of MASONIC vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team
Sangal on Inferno Analysis
Sangal demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Sangal on Inferno were soulfly, who contributed 36 kills, and S3NSEY, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 12936 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Sangal held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
MASONIC on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MASONIC, as they managed to secure 17 out of 36 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno included Cabbi, who contributed 33 kills, and kraghen, who added 28 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 13050 total damage, MASONIC couldn't prevent Sangal from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires