0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.32
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3015.0371
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:46s00:39s
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
3
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
9326.8
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
9126.8
Informations
Map Analysis of MASONIC vs Flames Ascent by the Bo3.gg Team
Flames Ascent on Inferno Analysis
Flames Ascent demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Flames Ascent on Inferno were hAnsi, who contributed 25 kills, and FeZ, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10519 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Flames Ascent held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
MASONIC on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MASONIC, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno included j3nsyy, who contributed 32 kills, and Anlelele, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 11090 total damage, MASONIC couldn't prevent Flames Ascent from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires