0 Commentaires
Records Vertigo
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec cocktails Molotov en moyenne par carte
21.0849
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:30s00:39s
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
114.6963
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4398
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
17.13.8
Dégâts (total/round)
39673
Dégâts (total/round)
39473
Score du joueur (round)
39971012
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Informations
Map Analysis of MASONIC vs Bitfix by the Bo3.gg Team
MASONIC on Vertigo Analysis
MASONIC demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for MASONIC on Vertigo were notaN, who contributed 23 kills, and kraghen, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 10335 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, MASONIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bitfix on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Bitfix, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bitfix on Vertigo included gazi, who contributed 12 kills, and zame, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7121 total damage, Bitfix couldn't prevent MASONIC from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Bitfix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires