0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
6.8
5.3
Inferno1.5
Manches gagnées
16
11
Inferno5
Éliminations
105
71
Inferno34
Dégâts
10.85K
8.25K
Inferno2601
Économie
615.05K
512.55K
Inferno102500
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Nuke
60%
Overpass
49%
Dust II
36%
Ancient
1
35%
Vertigo
14%
Inferno
0%
Mirage
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Nuke
60%
35
15
Overpass
74%
39
11
Dust II
56%
34
20
Ancient
65%
40
10
Vertigo
74%
27
10
Inferno
64%
36
15
Mirage
25%
4
59
Dernières 5 cartes
Nuke
0%
0
14
Overpass
25%
8
1
Dust II
20%
5
8
Ancient
100%
7
0
Vertigo
60%
10
0
Inferno
64%
14
1
Mirage
25%
4
8
Informations
Match analysis of MASONIC vs 1PIN by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MASONIC and 1PIN, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by MASONIC. The MVP of this match was Tauson.
MASONIC analytics
The team MASONIC secured 27 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MASONIC were Tauson contributed 25 kills and j3nsyy contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10850 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MASONIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
1PIN analytics
The team 1PIN managed to secure 0 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 1PIN were shyyne contributed 18 kills and AZUWU contributed 15 kills. 8249 of total damage by 1PIN could not prevent MASONIC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 1PIN struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires