0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
58%
Ancient
53%
Overpass
47%
Inferno
40%
Vertigo
37%
Nuke
20%
Anubis
10%
Dust II
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
75%
4
2
Ancient
14%
7
1
Overpass
0%
0
7
Inferno
86%
7
0
Vertigo
25%
12
1
Nuke
20%
5
3
Anubis
40%
10
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
17%
6
13
Ancient
67%
15
15
Overpass
47%
17
3
Inferno
46%
24
1
Vertigo
62%
21
6
Nuke
0%
3
16
Anubis
50%
20
1
Dust II
0%
0
5
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ppgpp
- gppgg
Informations
Match analysis of Make Your Destiny vs GTZ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Make Your Destiny and GTZ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Vertigo, and victory was secured by GTZ. The MVP of this match was PR.
GTZ analytics
The team GTZ secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GTZ were PR contributed 41 kills and Shr contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18808 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GTZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Make Your Destiny analytics
The team Make Your Destiny managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Make Your Destiny were Jaepe contributed 36 kills and P3R3IIRA contributed 32 kills. 15072 of total damage by Make Your Destiny could not prevent GTZ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Make Your Destiny struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires